Norwood v. United States of America et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn on 7/2/2013. (KAM, )
2013 Jul-02 PM 04:43
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
LARRY WAYNE NORWOOD,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NOS.
This is an action brought by Larry Wayne Norwood, a federal prisoner acting pro se. In
his initial pleading, captioned “Claim for Damages,” Norwood demands $500,000 in damages for
allegedly deficient medical care he received at the Federal Correctional Institution in Talladega,
Alabama. (Doc. 1). Based on that pleading, the Clerk opened the instant case, classifying it as
one on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. However, the court is
aware that the Clerk has also recently opened another case based on an identical pleading, with
that separate case being classified as a “regular” civil action and assigned to Judge Propst. See
Norwood v. United States, et al., 1:13-cv-1196-RBP-JEO, Doc. 1 (N.D. Ala. June 27, 2013).
Upon consideration, the instant action is due to be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, on the
grounds that the action (1) does not seek habeas relief, see Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475,
494 (1973), and (2) is duplicative of the civil action for damages pending before Judge Propst.
See I.A. Durbin, Inc., v. Jefferson Nat. Bank, 793 F.2d 1541, 1551-52 (11th Cir. 1986). A
separate final order will be entered.
DONE, this 2nd day of July, 2013.
SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?