The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Boyd et al

Filing 31

ORDER -re: R&R 30 . The court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge and ACCEPTS the recommendations. It is ORDERED that this court will hold an evidentiary hearing, on a date after six months from the entry of this order. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 9/16/2015. (AVC)

Download PDF
FILED 2015 Sep-16 AM 08:46 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION FREDERICK L. BOYD, Plaintiff vs. FREDERICK MONTEZ BOYD, Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:14-cv-01110-VEH ORDER On August 31, 2015, the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation was entered with respect to the Motion to Approve Distribution of Interplead Funds filed by defendant Frederick Montez Boyd, and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. No party has filed objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the magistrate judge. It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this court will hold an evidentiary hearing, on a date after six months from the entry of this order, to determine whether Frederick Montez Boyd has established, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the killing of Cormella Boyd by Frederick Boyd was “felonious and intentional” under Ala. Code § 43-8-253(c), in order to determine the proper party to whom the interpled funds should be distributed. DONE and ORDERED this 16th day of September, 2015. VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS United States District Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?