Roberts v. Vogle et al

Filing 14

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 11/27/2017. (PSM)

Download PDF
FILED 2017 Nov-27 PM 03:20 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION SEDRIC A. ROBERTS, Plaintiff, v. STACY VOGLE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:17-cv-00672-LSC-TMP MEMORANDUM OPINION The magistrate judge filed a report on October 27, 2017, recommending this action be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). (Doc. 12 at 15). The magistrate judge further recommended the plaintiff’s state law claims be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c). (Id.). Although the magistrate judge advised the plaintiff of his right to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days, no objections have been received by the court. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the magistrate judge’s report is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Therefore, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), the plaintiff’s federal claims are due to be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Additionally, the plaintiff’s state law claims asserted in the complaint are due to be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). A Final Judgment will be entered. DONE and ORDERED on November 27, 2017. _____________________________ L. Scott Coogler United States District Judge 160704 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?