Roberts v. Vogle et al
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 11/27/2017. (PSM)
FILED
2017 Nov-27 PM 03:20
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
SEDRIC A. ROBERTS,
Plaintiff,
v.
STACY VOGLE, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:17-cv-00672-LSC-TMP
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The magistrate judge filed a report on October 27, 2017, recommending this
action be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief
can be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). (Doc. 12 at 15). The magistrate
judge further recommended the plaintiff’s state law claims be dismissed without
prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c). (Id.). Although the magistrate judge
advised the plaintiff of his right to file specific written objections within fourteen
(14) days, no objections have been received by the court.
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the
court file, including the report and recommendation, the magistrate judge’s report
is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Therefore, in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), the plaintiff’s federal claims are due to be
dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be
granted. Additionally, the plaintiff’s state law claims asserted in the complaint are
due to be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3).
A Final Judgment will be entered.
DONE and ORDERED on November 27, 2017.
_____________________________
L. Scott Coogler
United States District Judge
160704
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?