Stephanie Sorocko v. Pfizer Inc.

Filing 22

ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties Motion to Stay pending a transfer decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation is GRANTED. [Doc. 20 ] All pretrial proceedings and deadlines are hereby stayed pending a decision by Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Rule 16 Order dated July 10, 2009, is hereby VACATED, and the Court will not hold the Rule 16 Conference previously set for August 6, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to withdraw her prior Motion to Stay is GRANTED. [Doc. 21 ] Plaintiffs Motion to Stay is DENIED as moot. [Doc. 19 ] Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 7/27/09. (KJF, ) [Transferred from Missouri Eastern on 10/15/2009.]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION STEPHANIE SOROCKO, Plaintiff, v. PFIZER, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This matter is before the Court on the parties' Motion to Stay pending a transfer decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. The Court finds that the motion to stay should be granted to conserve judicial resources and prevent inconsistent pretrial orders pending transfer. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' Motion to Stay pending a transfer decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation is GRANTED. [Doc. 20] All pretrial proceedings and deadlines are hereby stayed pending a decision by Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Rule 16 Order dated July 10, 2009, is hereby VACATED, and the Court will not hold the Rule 16 Conference previously set for August 6, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to withdraw her prior Motion to Stay is GRANTED. [Doc. 21] Plaintiff's Motion to Stay is DENIED as moot. [Doc. 19]

No. 4:08-CV-1714 CAS

CHARLES A. SHAW UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 27th day of July 2009.