Patterson v. Sutton et al

Filing 45

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 04/26/12. (CVA)

FILED
2012 Apr-26 PM 04:30
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JAMAL PATTERSON,
Plaintiff,
vs.
OFFICER SUTTON, OFFICER GARY,
OFFICER McDONALD, and
LPN J. SHARIETT,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:10-CV-1818-AKK-JEO

MEMORANDUM OPINION
The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on October 31, 2011, recommending
that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted and this cause be dismissed with
prejudice. Although Jamal Patterson requested multiple extensions, which the court granted, docs.
37 & 44, no objections have been filed by any party.
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including
the report and recommendation and the objections filed by the plaintiff, the Court is of the opinion
that the magistrate judge’s report is due to be and is hereby ADOPTED and his recommendation is
ACCEPTED. The court finds that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the
defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, defendants’ motion for
summary judgment is due to be GRANTED and this action is due to be DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE. A Final Judgment will be entered.

DONE this 26th day of April, 2012.

________________________________
ABDUL K. KALLON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE