Payne v. Oneonta City School
ORDER and FINAL JUDGMENT adopting report and accepting recommendations; dft's motion for summary judgment (doc #12) is GRANTED; FINAL JUDGMENT is entered in favor of dft Oneonta City Board of Education and against pla Lawrence Payne; this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, costs are taxed against pla. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 4/4/13. (ASL)
2013 Apr-05 AM 08:25
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
ONEONTA CITY BOARD
Case No. 2:10-cv-02988-RDP
ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT
On December 17, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation in the
above-styled cause (Doc. # 34), recommending that this court grant Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (Doc. # 12). The parties were advised of their right to file specific written
objections within fifteen (15) days, and Plaintiff has filed objections to the Report and
Recommendation. (Doc. # 35).
Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all of the materials in the court file,
including the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. # 35), and Defendant's
Response thereto (Doc. # 36), the court is of the opinion that the Report is due to be, and hereby is,
ADOPTED, and the Recommendation is ACCEPTED.
Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 12) is GRANTED. It is
hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that FINAL JUDGMENT be entered in favor
of Defendant Oneonta City Board of Education and against Plaintiff Lawrence Payne. This case is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Costs are taxed against Plaintiff.
DONE and ORDERED this
day of April, 2013.
R. DAVID PROCTOR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?