Austin v. Brunos et al

Filing 123

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER-re: R&R 119 . The Magistrate Judge's Report is hereby ADOPTED and the Recommendation is ACCEPTED. It is hereby ORDERED that Pltf's Motion for Summary Judgment 100 is DENIED. This matter is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 8/14/2013. (AVC)

Austin v. Certegy Payment Recovery Services, Inc., et al

Doc. 123

FILED
2013 Aug-14 AM 11:55
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
TIFFANY AUSTIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
CERTEGY PAYMENT RECOVERY
SERVICES, INC., and CERTEGY
CHECK SERVICES, INC.,
Defendants,

}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}

Case No.: 2:11-cv-00401-JHE

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. #119) on March 22, 2013,
recommending that Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment on her claims against Certegy Check
Services, Inc. as to liability only (Doc. #100) be denied. The parties were advised of their right to
file specific written objections. Plaintiff has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.
(Doc. #120). Defendant Certegy Check Services, Inc. responded to Plaintiff's objections. (Doc.
#121).
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including
the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's objections, and Defendant's response, the court is of the
opinion that the Magistrate Judge's Report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED and the
Recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and
DECREED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #100) is DENIED.
This matter is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings consistent with
this opinion and order.

Dockets.Justia.com

DONE and ORDERED this

14th

day of August, 2013.

___________________________________
R. DAVID PROCTOR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2