Austin v. Brunos et al

Filing 128

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER-re: R&R 124 . The court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge's Report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED and the Recommendation is ACCEPTED. It is hereby ORDERED that Dfts' Motion for Summary Judgment 58 is GRANTED and final judgment be entered in favor of Dfts. All of Pltf's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 2/11/2014. (AVC)

FILED
2014 Feb-11 PM 04:13
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
TIFFANY AUSTIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
CERTEGY PAYMENT RECOVERY
SERVICES, INC., and CERTEGY
CHECK SERVICES, INC.,
Defendants.

}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}

Case No.: 2:11-CV-00401-RDP

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. #124) on January 13,
2014, recommending that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #58) be granted.
The parties were advised of their right to file specific written objections. Plaintiff has filed
objections to the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. #125). Defendants responded to Plaintiff’s
objections. (Doc. #127).
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file,
including the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s objections, and Defendants’ response, the
court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge’s Report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED
and the Recommendation is ACCEPTED.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED,

ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #58) is
GRANTED and that final judgment be entered in favor of Defendants. All of Plaintiff’s claims
are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

DONE and ORDERED this February 11, 2014.

_________________________________
R. DAVID PROCTOR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2