Puryear v. North Courtland Police Dept. et al
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER-re:R&R 38 . The court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. It is ORDERED that the dft's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. This matter is REFERRED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Robert B Propst on 9/26/2013. (AVC)
2013 Sep-26 AM 09:18
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
CARL EDWARD PURYEAR,
OFFICER BRANDON SHANE MUNDY,
Case No. 2:11-cv-02600-RBP-JEO
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
The magistrate judge filed a report on August 30, 2013, recommending that the defendant’s
special report be treated as a motion for summary judgment and, as such, that it be denied. Although
the parties were advised of their right to file specific written objections within fourteen days, there
has been no response to the report and recommendation.
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo the report and recommendation of the
magistrate judge, the Court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is due to be and hereby
is ADOPTED and his recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the
defendant’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED. This matter is REFERRED to the
magistrate judge for further proceedings.
DONE, this the 26th day of September, 2013.
ROBERT B. PROPST
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?