Ramirez v. Jefferson County Sheriff's Department et al
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION-re: R&R 18 . The court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge's Report is due to be and is hereby ADOPTED and the Recommendation is ACCEPTED. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 7/26/2012. (AVC)
2012 Jul-26 PM 01:19
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
JESUS AGUILAR RAMIREZ,
JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT, et al.,
) Case No. 2:12-cv-00187-RDP-JEO
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on July 3, 2012,
recommending that this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 be dismissed under
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
(Doc. 16.) On July 12, 2012, Plaintiff filed a response in which he states, “I sincerely
agree with the Recommendation that this complaint be dismissed as failing to state
a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).”
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court
file, including the Report and Recommendation and Plaintiff’s response thereto, the
court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge's Report is due to be and is hereby
ADOPTED and the Recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, the complaint
is due to be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failing to state a claim
upon which relief may be granted. A Final Judgment will be entered.
DONE and ORDERED this
day of July, 2012.
R. DAVID PROCTOR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?