Maye v. Thomas et al
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM OPINION - The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on April 28, 2015. No objections have been filed by any party. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is due to be and is hereby ADOPTED and his recommendation is ACCEPTED. The Court EXPRESSLY FINDS that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the defe ndant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Defendant Gadson's motion for summary judgment is due to be GRANTED and this action is due to be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 5/20/15. (CTS, )
FILED
2015 May-20 PM 03:36
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ANTWAIN VONTELL MAYE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
) Case No. 2:12-cv-02478-LSC-TMP
)
COMMISSIONER KIM THOMAS, et al., )
)
Defendants.
)
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on April 28, 2015,
recommending that Defendant Gadson’s motion for summary judgment be granted
and this cause be dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 22). No objections have been filed
by any party.
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court
file, including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the
magistrate judge’s report is due to be and is hereby ADOPTED and his
recommendation is ACCEPTED. The Court EXPRESSLY FINDS that there are no
genuine issues of material fact and that the defendant is entitled to judgment as a
matter of law. Accordingly, Defendant Gadson’s motion for summary judgment is
due to be GRANTED and this action is due to be DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE. A Final Judgment will be entered.
Done this 20th day of May 2015.
L. Scott Coogler
United States District Judge
[160704]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?