Roberts v. Midfield Police Department et al
ORDER -re: R&R 7 . The court hereby ADOPTS the Report and ACCEPTS the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. It is ORDERED that Pltf's claims against Midfield Police Department are DISMISSED. Pltf's Fourth Amendment claim against Officer T. Yearwood is REFERRED to the Honorable T. Michael Putnam for further proceedings. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 12/4/2013. (AVC)
2013 Dec-04 PM 02:05
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
CEDRIC ALONZO ROBERTS,
MIDFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT
and OFFICER T. YEARWOOD,
Case No.: 2:12-CV-04114-RDP-TMP
On November 8, 2013, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 7) was
entered and the parties were allowed fourteen days in which to file objections to the
recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed by either party.
After careful consideration of the record in this case and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the Report of the Magistrate Judge. The court further
ACCEPTS the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and it is, therefore, ORDERED,
ADJUDGED and DECREED as follows:
Plaintiff’s claims against Midfield Police Department are DISMISSED for failing
to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).
Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claim against Officer T. Yearwood is REFERRED
to the Honorable T. Michael Putnam for further proceedings.
DONE and ORDERED this
day of December, 2013.
R. DAVID PROCTOR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?