Howard v. Patterson et al

Filing 16

FINAL JUDGMENT in accordance with memorandum opinion, the petition for writ habeas corpus in this action is DENIED and this action DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 8/27/14. (ASL)

FILED
2014 Aug-27 PM 02:55
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MICHAEL LAMAR HOWARD,
Petitioner
v.
TONY PATTERSON, Warden, and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE STATE OF ALABAMA,
Respondents

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:12-cv-04185-JFG-HGD

FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered contemporaneously
herewith and Rule 58, Fed.R.Civ.P., it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED
that the petition for writ of habeas corpus in this action is due to be and hereby is
DENIED and this action DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
DONE and ORDERED this 27th day of August, 2014.

MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 1