Broughton v. Holland

Filing 10

ORDER-re: R&R 9 . The Court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Signed by Judge William M Acker, Jr on 12/27/2013. (AVC)

FILED
2013 Dec-27 AM 10:09
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION

CEPEDA BROUGHTON,

)
)
Petitioner,
)
vs.
)
)
J.C. HOLLAND, Warden, USP-McCreary; )
and the ATTORNEY GENERAL of the
)
STATE OF ALABAMA
)
)
Respondent.
)

Case No. 2:13-cv-00347-WMA-TMP

ORDER

On December 9, 2013, the magistrate judge filed his report and recommendation in the
above-styled cause, recommending that this petition for habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2254 be denied and dismissed with prejudice. To date, no objections have been filed.
Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file,
including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and
hereby is ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Consequently, the petition for writ
of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the above-styled cause is due to be and is
hereby DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

DATED this 27th day of December, 2013.

_____________________________
_____________________________
WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE