Broughton v. Holland
ORDER-re: R&R 9 . The Court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Signed by Judge William M Acker, Jr on 12/27/2013. (AVC)
2013 Dec-27 AM 10:09
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
J.C. HOLLAND, Warden, USP-McCreary; )
and the ATTORNEY GENERAL of the
STATE OF ALABAMA
Case No. 2:13-cv-00347-WMA-TMP
On December 9, 2013, the magistrate judge filed his report and recommendation in the
above-styled cause, recommending that this petition for habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2254 be denied and dismissed with prejudice. To date, no objections have been filed.
Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file,
including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and
hereby is ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Consequently, the petition for writ
of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the above-styled cause is due to be and is
hereby DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
DATED this 27th day of December, 2013.
WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?