Threats v. Bessemer, City of et al

Filing 40

MEMORANDUM OPINION - Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is due to be and is hereby ADOP TED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, for the easons stated in the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, defendants' motions for summary judgment, (doc. 23 and 25), are due to be granted. A Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn on 3/23/15. (CTS, )

Download PDF
FILED 2015 Mar-23 PM 02:38 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION CHANTERIA THREATS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. CITY OF BESSEMER; OFFICER MIKE JONES, Defendants. Case No. 2:13-cv-00486-SLB MEMORANDUM OPINION The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on January 13, 2015, recommending that this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). (Doc. 38).1 No objections were filed by the plaintiff. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge’s report is due to be and is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, defendants’ motions for summary judgment, (doc. 23 and 25), are due to be granted. A Final Judgment will be entered. DONE this 23rd day of March, 2015. SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Reference to a document number, [“Doc. ___”], refers to the number assigned to each document as it is filed in the court’s record.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?