Moore v. Dynamic Recovery Services Inc et al
Filing
17
ORDER The court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and is ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Consequently, plaintiffs motion for default judgment is GRANTED. It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that final judgment be and is ENTERED in favor of plaintiff Edna Moore, and against defendants, Dynamic Recover Services, Inc., and Joyce Ward, in the amount of $44,035. Costs are taxed against defendants. Signed by Judge William M Acker, Jr on 2/6/14. (SAC )
FILED
2014 Feb-06 PM 03:27
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
EDNA MOORE,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
vs.
DYNAMIC RECOVERY SERVICES,
INC., and JOYCE WARD,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:13-cv-00681-WMA
ORDER
On January 16, 2014, the magistrate judge filed his report and
recommendation in the above-styled case, recommending that default
judgment be entered in plaintiff’s favor and that plaintiff be
awarded
$1,000
in
statutory
damages,
$30,000
in
compensatory
damages, and $13,035 in attorneys’ fees.
No party in this case has exercised the right to object to the
report and recommendation within fourteen days of its issuance.
This court has now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all
the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation.
and
The court is of the opinion that the report is due to be
hereby
is
ADOPTED,
and
the
recommendation
is
ACCEPTED.
Consequently, plaintiff’s motion for default judgment is GRANTED.
It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that final judgment be and
hereby is ENTERED in favor of plaintiff Edna Moore, and against
defendants, Dynamic Recover Services, Inc., and Joyce Ward, in the
amount of $44,035.
Costs are taxed against defendants.
DONE this 6th day of February, 2014.
_____________________________
WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?