Marquez v. Price et al

Filing 20

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 8/26/2015. (AVC)

Download PDF
FILED 2015 Aug-26 PM 04:24 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION JULIO C. MARQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN PRICE, et. al., Defendants. } } } } } } } } } Case No.: 2:13-cv-01714-RDP-JEO AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION On July 28, 2015, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 17) was entered and the parties were allowed therein fifteen (15) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. No objections were filed. After careful consideration of the record in this case and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the Report of the Magistrate Judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge: (1) that the failure to protect and deliberate indifference to serious medical need claims against Defendant Campbell and all claims against Defendants Campbell 1, Price, Hicks, Miree, Taylor, Felton, Giddy, Davis, Jenkins, and Moore be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and/or (2); and (2) that the excessive force claim against Defendant Gaines be referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. A separate order in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion will be entered. 1 Although discussed in the body of the Report and Recommendation entered on July 28, 2015, the report did not specifically recommend the dismissal of the claim of deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against defendant Campbell, or the claims against defendant Miree; therefore, this court’s prior Memorandum Opinion and Order did not address the claims against Campbell and Miree either. DONE and ORDERED this August 26, 2015. _________________________________ R. DAVID PROCTOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?