Rutledge v. Aveda et al
ORDER ADOPTING 56 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and DENYING plff's 51 MOTION for Leave to Submit an Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 1/15/2016. (YMB)
2016 Jan-15 AM 10:31
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
AVEDA, et al.,
Civil Action Number
The magistrate judge filed a report on December 11, 2015, doc. 56,
recommending that Adrienne Rutledge’s motion for leave to file an amended
complaint, doc. 51, be denied because her proposed amended complaint, doc. 51-1,
would be futile as the amendment failed to allege facts to support all of the
elements of any of her claims. Although the plaintiff was advised of her right to
file specific written objections, she has failed to respond to the report and
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the
court file, including the report and recommendation, the court is of the opinion that
the magistrate judge’s report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED and the
Page 1 of 2
magistrate judge’s recommendation is ACCEPTED. It is therefore ORDERED
that Rutledge’s motion for leave to amend, doc. 51, be DENIED.
DONE the 15th day of January, 2016.
ABDUL K. KALLON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?