Jackson v. Zurkerburg
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 7/16/14. (SAC )
FILED
2014 Jul-16 AM 11:34
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
RICARDO J. JACKSON, II,
Plaintiff
vs.
MARK ZURKERBURG,
Defendant
)
)
)
)
) Case No. 2:14-cv-01061-KOB
)
)
)
)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On June 10, 2014, the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation was
entered and the parties were allowed fourteen days in which to file objections to the
recommendations made by the magistrate judge. The plaintiff did not file objections
to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. Instead, he filed a “Motion of
Writ of Injunction Shut Down Ordered” (doc. 4) and “Motion of Injunction Ordered”
(doc. 5). In both, he reiterate his concerns about the “obscene” material on Facebook,
etc. While the court may agree that some people abuse social media, the plaintiff has
not demonstrated that he has standing for seeking an injunction against Mr.
“Zurkerburg” or Facebook, as explained in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation.
After careful consideration of the record in this case and the Magistrate Judge’s
Report and Recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate
judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the magistrate judge that
Page 1 of 2
this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and
(ii).
A separate Order in conformity with this Memorandum Opinion will be
entered.
DONE and ORDERED this 16th day of July, 2014.
____________________________________
KARON OWEN BOWDRE
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?