Jackson v. Zurkerburg

Filing 6

MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 7/16/14. (SAC )

Download PDF
FILED 2014 Jul-16 AM 11:34 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION RICARDO J. JACKSON, II, Plaintiff vs. MARK ZURKERBURG, Defendant ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:14-cv-01061-KOB ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION On June 10, 2014, the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation was entered and the parties were allowed fourteen days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. The plaintiff did not file objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. Instead, he filed a “Motion of Writ of Injunction Shut Down Ordered” (doc. 4) and “Motion of Injunction Ordered” (doc. 5). In both, he reiterate his concerns about the “obscene” material on Facebook, etc. While the court may agree that some people abuse social media, the plaintiff has not demonstrated that he has standing for seeking an injunction against Mr. “Zurkerburg” or Facebook, as explained in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. After careful consideration of the record in this case and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the magistrate judge that Page 1 of 2 this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). A separate Order in conformity with this Memorandum Opinion will be entered. DONE and ORDERED this 16th day of July, 2014. ____________________________________ KARON OWEN BOWDRE CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?