Wideman v. Price et al

Filing 7

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, as set out, re Report and Recommendation 6 . The parties were allowed an opportunity in which to file objections. No objections have been received from either party. The court is of the opinion that the magistrate ju dge's findings are due to be and are hereby ADOPTED and her recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is due to be denied. Additionally, for the reasons set forth in the report and recommendation (Doc. 6 at 4), a certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing 2254 Proceedings is hereby DENIED. A Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn on 12/17/14. (CTS, )

FILED
2014 Dec-17 PM 02:13
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
BOBBY J WIDEMAN,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Petitioner,
v.
CHERYL PRICE, WARDEN, et al.,
Respondents.

Case No. 2:14-cv-1155-SLB-SGC

)
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on September 12, 2014, recommending
the petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, be denied as time-barred.
(Doc. 6). The parties were allowed an opportunity in which to file objections. No objections have been
received from either party.
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, the court is
of the opinion that the magistrate judge’s findings are due to be and are hereby ADOPTED and her
recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is due to be
denied. Additionally, for the reasons set forth in the report and recommendation (Doc. 6 at 4), a
certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing 2254 Proceedings is hereby
DENIED.
A Final Judgment will be entered.
DONE this 17th day of December, 2014.

SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE