Campbell-Townes v. Amedisys Holding LLC
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION, as set out, re the parties joint motion for approval of settlement 24 . Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 5/19/15. (CTS, )
2015 May-19 PM 12:59
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
AMEDISYS HOLDING, LLC
Memorandum of Opinion
Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion for approval of settlement.
(Doc. 24.) This suit was brought by Plaintiff Valerie Campbell-Townes (“CampbellTownes”) to collect alleged unpaid overtime compensation under the Fair Labor
Standards Act (“FLSA”). See 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. In the “context of suits brought
directly by employees against their employer . . . to recover back wages for FLSA
violations,” any party to an FLSA settlement must present any proposed settlement
to the district court, which “may enter a stipulated judgment after scrutinizing the
settlement for fairness.” Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States Dept’ of Labor, 679
F.2d 1350, 1353 (11th Cir. 1982).
Page 1 of 2
Having considered the guidelines set forth by the Eleventh Circuit for approval
of an FLSA settlement, the Court finds that the proposed settlement agreement is fair,
as it reflects a reasonable compromise of issues actually in dispute. The settlement was
reached in an adversarial context in which Campbell-Townes was represented by
competent and experienced counsel, and the totality of the proposed settlement is fair
and reasonable as required by Lynn’s Food. Id. at 1354. Furthermore, the proposed
agreement does not bind non-parties to the present action. Lastly, the proposed
agreement does not ask the Court to assess attorney’s fees, as the parties have agreed
on the amount owed.
For the reasons stated above, the joint motion for approval of settlement
agreement (Doc. 24) is due to be granted.
Done this 19th day of May 2015.
L. SCOTT COOGLER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?