Norris v. Manheim Remarketing, Inc.
ORDER ADOPTING and ACCEPTING the Magistrate Judge's 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiff's claim in Count One of his complaint seeking relief under the Alabama Workers Compen sation Act is SEVERED and REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Jefferson County. FINDING AS MOOT 2 MOTION for the Employment of Attorney. This Court RETAINS jurisdiction over Plaintiff's claim in Count Two of his complaint for violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Signed by Judge James H Hancock on 4/7/2015. (JLC, )
2015 Apr-07 AM 11:02
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
REX DAVID NORRIS,
MANHEIM REMARKETING, INC.,
) Case No. 2:15-cv-00423-HGD
On March 13, 2015, the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation was
entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file
objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. No objections to
the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation have been filed by plaintiff or
After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge’s
report and recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate
judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the magistrate judge.
It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that plaintiff’s claim in
Count One of his complaint seeking relief under the Alabama Worker’s
Compensation Act is SEVERED and REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Jefferson
County. It is further ORDERED that plaintiff’s Petition for the Employment of
Attorney Under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Alabama (Doc. 2) is MOOT
in this court. This court RETAINS jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claim in Count Two
of his complaint for violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.
DONE this the 7th day of April, 2015.
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?