Wilson v. Miree et al

Filing 74

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Having reviewed the materials in the record, the Court adopts the magistrate judge's report and accepts her recommendation. Accordingly, the Court denies Officer Gadson's motion for summary judgment and refers this matter to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 11/8/2019. (KEK)

Download PDF
FILED 2019 Nov-08 PM 04:31 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ZACHERY WILSON, Plaintiff, v. RODERICK GADSON, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:16-cv-0634-MHH-SGC MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The magistrate judge entered a report on September 30, 2019, recommending that Officer Gadson’s motion for summary judgment be denied. (Doc. 72). The magistrate judge advised the parties of their right to file specific written objections within 14 days. The Court has not received objections. A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). A district court reviews legal conclusions in a report de novo and reviews for plain error factual findings to which no objection is made. Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n. 9 (11th Cir. 1993); see also LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749 (11th Cir. 1988); Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 Fed. Appx. 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Having reviewed the materials in the record, the Court adopts the magistrate judge’s report and accepts her recommendation. Accordingly, the Court denies Officer Gadson’s motion for summary judgment and refers this matter to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. The Clerk shall please serve a copy of this order on the plaintiff and on counsel of record. DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of November, 2019. _________________________________ MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?