Hudson v. Eversole et al

Filing 8

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 3/19/2018. (KAM)

FILED
2018 Mar-19 AM 11:28
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JAMERIO HUDSON,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
ATTORNEY STEVEN EVERSOLE )
and DISTRICT JUDGE DANIEL )
CROWSON,
)

Case No. 2:16-cv-01573-RDP-JHE

Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The Magistrate Judge filed a report on February 20, 2018, recommending this
action be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief
can be granted and for seeking monetary relief from a defendant who is immune
from such relief, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)-(2). (Doc. 7). The Magistrate
Judge further recommended that Plaintiff’s state law claims be dismissed without
prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). (Id.). Although the Magistrate Judge
advised Plaintiff of his right to file specific written objections within fourteen (14)
days, no objections have been received by the court.
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the
court file, including the report and recommendation, the Magistrate Judge’s report
is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Therefore, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)-(2), Plaintiff’s federal claims are due to
be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be
granted and for seeking monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such
suit. Additionally, Plaintiff’s state law claims asserted in the complaint are due to
be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3).
A Final Judgment will be entered.
DONE and ORDERED this March 19, 2018.

_________________________________
R. DAVID PROCTOR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2