Conner v. Sammy's Gentlemen's Club et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 8/25/17. (SAC )
2017 Aug-25 PM 03:55
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SAMMY’S GENTLMEN’S CLUB,
Aka SJB CORPORATION,
This case is before the court on Plaintiff’s motion to stay discovery (Doc. 18) and
Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 15).
On June 17, 2016, Plaintiff Timothy Conner filed in Jefferson County Circuit Court a
complaint against Sammy’s Gentlemen’s Club, raising claims of negligence, wantonness, and
assault and battery. On October 7, 2016, the Defendants removed the case. (Doc. 1). In March
2017 the court issued a scheduling order requiring the parties to commence discovery in time to
be completed by September 5, 2017. (Doc. 12). In July 2017 Defendant moved to compel
Plaintiff to provide initial disclosures and discovery responses, (Doc. 13) and on July 20, 2017,
the court ordered Plaintiff to provide those disclosures and to respond to Defendant’s first
interrogatories and request for production of documents by July 31, 2017. (Doc. 14). Plaintiff
has done neither of those things.
On August 3, 2017, Defendant moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b) to
dismiss the case for failure to provide discovery, contending that Plaintiff had not engaged in the
discovery process or complied with this court’s July 20 order. (Doc. 15). This court ordered
Plaintiff to show cause why the court should not grant the motion and dismiss the case as a
sanction for failure to comply with a court order. (Doc. 16). Plaintiff’s attorney responded,
contending that he had been unable to reach his client, Mr. Conner, and requesting a 90-day stay
of stay of discovery to find him. (Doc. 18). Defendant opposes the request for a stay. (Doc. 19).
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 permits a court to dismiss an action “[i]f the plaintiff
fails to prosecute or to comply with . . . a court order.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). And Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 37 permits a court to “dismiss[ ] the action or proceeding in whole or in part”
if a party “fails to obey an order to provide or permit discovery.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(v).
Mr. Conner has both failed to prosecute this case and to comply with this court’s July 20 order to
provide discovery, and his failures to act have prejudiced Defendant already. Therefore, this
court WILL DISMISS the case without prejudice. The court WILL DENY Plaintiff’s motion to
stay discovery. The court will enter a separate order consistent with this opinion.
DONE and ORDERED this August 25, 2017.
KARON OWEN BOWDRE
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?