The Boeing Company v. Tenenbaum Capital Partners, LLC
Filing
45
ORDER-re: Report and Recommendation (Case No. 2:11-cv-03577-RDP, doc# 285; Case No. 2:16-mc-01216-RDP, doc#43). The court hereby ADOPTS the Report and ACCEPTS the Recommendations of the Special Master. It is ORDERED that Tennenbaum Capital Partners, LLC's Motion for Sanctions and Cost Sharing is DENIED. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 11/22/2016. (AVC)
FILED
2016 Nov-22 PM 03:50
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
)
ALABAMA AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES,
)
INC., ALABAMA AIRCRAFT
INDUSTRIES, INC. – BIRMINGHAM, AND )
)
PEMCO AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING
)
SERVICES, INC.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
)
v.
)
)
THE BOEING COMPANY,
)
BOEING AEROSPACE OPERATIONS,
)
INC. AND BOEING AEROSPACE
)
SUPPORT CENTER,
)
)
Defendants.
)
THE BOEING COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v.
TENENBAUM CAPITAL PARTNERS,
LLC,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:11-cv-03577-RDP
Case No.: 2:16-mc-01216-RDP
ORDER
On October 17, 2016, the Special Master issued a Report and Recommendation (Case
No. 2:11-cv-03577-RDP, Doc. # 285; Case No. 2:16-mc-01216-RDP, Doc. # 43) containing the
recommendation that Tennenbaum Capital Partners, LLC’s “Motion for Sanctions and Cost
Sharing” (Case No. 2:16-mc-01216-RDP, Doc. # 8) be denied. No objections were filed to this
Report and Recommendation.
After careful consideration of the record in this case and the Special Master’s Report and
Recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the Reports of the Special Master. The court
further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the Special Master. It is therefore ORDERED that
Tennenbaum Capital Partners, LLC’s “Motion for Sanctions and Cost Sharing” is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED this November 22, 2016.
_________________________________
R. DAVID PROCTOR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?