Crenshaw v. Myers et al
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 2/28/18. (SAC )
FILED
2018 Feb-28 AM 10:02
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
STEVEN CRENSHAW,
Petitioner,
v.
WARDEN WALTER MYERS, and THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE
STATE OF ALABAMA,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case Number:
2:17-cv-01060-KOB-JEO
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Steven Crenshaw, an Alabama state prisoner acting pro se, filed this habeas corpus
action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 1). On January 23, 2017, the magistrate judge
to whom the case was referred for preliminary review entered a report and
recommendation (“R&R”). (Doc. 4). Specifically, he recommended that this action be
transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 1631. Despite being afforded an
opportunity to object the magistrate judge’s recommendation, Crenshaw has not filed any
objections.
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court
file, including the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court is of the
opinion that the magistrate judge’s findings are due to be and are hereby ADOPTED and
his recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, Crenshaw’s petition for a writ of
habeas corpus is due to be transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle
District of Alabama.
The court will enter a separate Order.
DONE and ORDERED this 28th day of February, 2018.
____________________________________
KARON OWEN BOWDRE
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?