Carmichael v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and ACCEPTS his recommendation. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 9/19/2022. (LMW)
2022 Sep-19 AM 08:33
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES,
INC., et al.,
Case No. 2:22-cv-00303-ACA-JHE
Plaintiff Roderick Carmichael filed a pro se complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983, alleging violations of his rights under the Constitution or laws of the United
States. (Doc. 1). On June 28, 2022, the magistrate judge ordered him to amend his
complaint by July 19, 2022. (Doc. 3). When Mr. Carmichael failed to file an
amended complaint by that deadline, the magistrate judge entered another order
requiring him to file an amended complaint by August 15, 2022 and warning him
that if he did not do so, the court might dismiss the action under Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 41(b). (Doc. 4). Mr. Carmichael did not comply with that order, so
the magistrate judge entered a report recommending the court dismiss this action for
Mr. Carmichael’s failure to comply with a court order. (Doc. 5). Although the
magistrate judge advised Mr. Carmichael of his right to file objections within
fourteen days, the court has not received any objections within the prescribed time.
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the
court file, including the report and recommendation, the court ADOPTS the
magistrate judge’s report and ACCEPTS his recommendation. Accordingly, this
court WILL DISMISS this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
DONE and ORDERED this September 19, 2022.
ANNEMARIE CARNEY AXON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?