Roberts v. Thomas et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION-re: R&R 4 . The court ADOPTS the report and ACCEPTS the recommendations of the magistrate judge. Signed by Judge Robert B Propst on 7/17/2013. (AVC)
2013 Jul-17 AM 09:31
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
THOMAS JAMES ROBERTS,
WILLIE THOMAS, Warden, and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE STATE OF ALABAMA,
Case No. 3:13-cv-01072-RBP-HGD
On July 1, 2013, the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation was entered
and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to
the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. On July 9, 2013, petitioner filed
objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation.
After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge’s
report and recommendation and the petitioner’s objections thereto, the court hereby
ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge. The court further ACCEPTS the
recommendations of the magistrate judge that the petition for writ of habeas corpus
be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1) and for failure to comply with
28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A).
A separate order in conformity with this Memorandum Opinion will be entered
DONE this 17th day of July, 2013.
ROBERT B. PROPST
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?