Key v. Florence Police Department
MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge William M Acker, Jr on 2/8/16. (SAC )
2016 Feb-08 PM 02:08
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
DEMARCUS MONTREL KEY,
OFFICER JEFF REDCROSS,
Case No. 3:15-cv-00979-WMA-HGD
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on December 4, 2015,
recommending that this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 be dismissed under
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
(Doc. 10). The plaintiff filed objections to the report and recommendation. (Doc.
11). Having considered said objections, the court finds as follows.
The plaintiff objects to the application of the statute of limitations to his claims.
Statutes of limitations create “a time limit for suing in a civil case.” CTS Corp. v.
Waldburger, – U.S.–, 134 S.Ct. 2175, 182 (2014). Application of the statute of
limitations is not a discretionary matter for the court. No basis appears in the
Page 1 of 2
plaintiff’s complaint or amended complaint which would permit the court to toll the
statute. Because the court must apply the statute of limitations, and because the
statute acts a complete bar to the continuation of this action, the plaintiff’s objection
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court
file, including the report and recommendation and the objections thereto, the court
is of the opinion that the magistrate judge’s report is due to be and is hereby is
ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, the plaintiff’s
complaint is due to be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failing to state
a claim upon which relief may be granted. A Final Judgment will be entered.
DATED this 8th day of February, 2016.
WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?