Cabral v. Hassell et al

Filing 10

ORDER The court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and ACCEPTS his recommendation. The court finds that the Respondents' Motion to Dismiss is due to be granted because the petitioner is no longer in ICE custody pursuant to an Order of Supervision on August 28, 2012. Consequently, the court GRANTS the motion to dismiss (doc. 7) and DISMISSES AS MOOT the habeas petition. Signed by Judge Karon O Bowdre on 8/27/13. (SAC )

Download PDF
FILED 2013 Aug-27 AM 10:13 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION MARCELINO V. CABRAL, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, vs. SCOTT HASSELL, Warden; et al., Respondents. Case No. 4:12-cv-2029-KOB-TMP ORDER On July 8, 2013, the magistrate judge filed his report and recommendation (doc. 8), recommending that the court grant the Respondents' motion to dismiss (doc. 7) and dismiss as moot the habeas petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 because the petitioner was no longer in ICE custody pursuant to an Order of Supervision. To date, no party has filed any objections. The Clerk mailed a copy of the Report and Recommendation to the Petitioner, but the postal service returned the mail as undeliverable and marked "released." (Doc. 9). Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the Report and Recommendation, the court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and ACCEPTS his recommendation. The court finds that the Respondents' Motion to Dismiss is due to be granted because the petitioner is no longer in ICE custody pursuant to an Order of Supervision on August 28, 2012. Consequently, the court GRANTS the motion to dismiss (doc. 7) and DISMISSES AS MOOT the habeas petition. DONE and ORDERED this 27th day of August, 2013. ____________________________________ KARON OWEN BOWDRE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?