Hoskin v. Roy, et al.

Filing 61

MEMORANDUM OPINION as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 9/1/2015. (AHI)

FILED
2015 Sep-01 AM 10:10
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
MIDDLE DIVISION
TORRECO HOSKIN,
Plaintiff,
vs.
OFFICER KENNEDY ROY,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 4:12-cv-02067-CLS-HGD

MEMORANDUM OPINION
On July 17, 2015, the magistrate judge entered his Proposed Findings of Fact
and Conclusions of Law, along with a recommendation for disposition of this action,
and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections.
On July 30, 2015, plaintiff filed objections.
After careful consideration of the record in this case, the proposed findings of
fact and conclusions of law and recommendation, and plaintiff’s objections thereto,
the court hereby ADOPTS the magistrate judge’s proposed findings of fact and
conclusions of law, and ACCEPTS his recommendations that judgment be entered in
favor of defendant Kennedy Roy and against plaintiff Torreco Hoskin with respect
to all remaining claims in this action, and that this action be dismissed with prejudice.
A separate order in conformity with this memorandum opinion will be entered
contemporaneously herewith.

DONE this 1st day of September, 2015.

______________________________
United States District Judge

2