Ramirez v. Holder et al
ORDER -re: R&R 10 . The Court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Robert B Propst on 8/28/2013. (AVC)
2013 Aug-28 AM 10:31
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
ALEXANDER R. RAMIREZ,
ERIC HOLDER, JR., et al.,
Case No. 4:12-cv-3437-RBP-TMP
On March 14, 2013, the magistrate judge filed his report and recommendation in the abovestyled cause, recommending that this petition for habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 be denied and dismissed as moot. To date, no objections have been filed by either party. The
Report and Recommendation mailed to petitioner has been returned as undeliverable and marked
Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file,
including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and
hereby is ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Consequently, the petition for writ
of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the above-styled cause is due to be and the
same is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
DONE and ORDERED this the 28th day of August, 2013.
ROBERT B. PROPST
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?