Diallo v. Holder Jr. et al

Filing 9

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 5/7/2013. (JLC)

Download PDF
FILED 2013 May-07 PM 12:29 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION KENDA DIALLO, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:13-cv-0724-VEH-JEO MEMORANDUM OPINION This is a habeas corpus case filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The pro se petitioner contends that he is being illegally detained by the respondents and that he is due to be released from custody pending his removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act. (Doc. 1). See Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001). The respondents have filed a motion to dismiss this matter as being moot. (Doc. 8). Upon consideration, the court finds that the respondents’ motion is due to be granted. In support of their motion to dismiss, the respondents have filed evidentiary materials showing that the petitioner was released from custody under order of supervision. (Doc. 8-1). Thus, the petitioner’s claim for release under an order of supervision or for repatriation is moot. See Nyaga v. Ashcroft, 323 F.3d 906, 913 (11th Cir. 2003) (“a case must be dismissed as moot if the court can no longer provide ‘meaningful relief’”). Accordingly, this matter is due to be dismissed as moot. A separate final order will be entered. DONE this 7th day of May, 2013. VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?