Tao v. Holder et al

Filing 9

ORDER re 8 Report and Recommendation: The Court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Consequently, the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the above-styled cause is due to be and the same is DISMISSED as MOOT. Signed by Judge William M Acker, Jr on 10/29/13. (SAC )

Download PDF
FILED 2013 Oct-29 PM 02:29 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION ZHU WEI TAO, Petitioner, vs. ERIC HOLDER, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:13-cv-00829-WMA-TMP ORDER On October 10, 2013, the magistrate judge filed his report and recommendation in the abovestyled cause, recommending that this petition for habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 be dismissed as moot. To date, no objections have been filed by either party. Mail sent by the court to Petitioner was returned as undeliverable and marked “Released” on September 4, 2013 and September 24, 2013. Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Consequently, the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the above-styled cause is due to be and the same is hereby DISMISSED as MOOT. ORDERED this 29th day of October, 2013. _____________________________ WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?