Tao v. Holder et al

Filing 9

ORDER re 8 Report and Recommendation: The Court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Consequently, the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the above-styled cause is due to be and the same is DISMISSED as MOOT. Signed by Judge William M Acker, Jr on 10/29/13. (SAC )

FILED
2013 Oct-29 PM 02:29
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
MIDDLE DIVISION
ZHU WEI TAO,
Petitioner,
vs.
ERIC HOLDER, et al.,
Respondents.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.

4:13-cv-00829-WMA-TMP

ORDER

On October 10, 2013, the magistrate judge filed his report and recommendation in the abovestyled cause, recommending that this petition for habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 be dismissed as moot. To date, no objections have been filed by either party. Mail sent by
the court to Petitioner was returned as undeliverable and marked “Released” on September 4, 2013
and September 24, 2013.
Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file,
including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and
hereby is ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Consequently, the petition for writ
of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the above-styled cause is due to be and the
same is hereby DISMISSED as MOOT.
ORDERED this 29th day of October, 2013.
_____________________________
WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE