Muhidin v. Holder et al

Filing 16

ORDER -re: R&R 14 . The court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. The Petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Robert B Propst on 12/5/2013. (AVC)

FILED
2013 Dec-05 AM 09:59
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
MIDDLE DIVISION
AHMED NASIR MUHIDIN,
Petitioner,
vs.
ERIC HOLDER, JR.,
ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al.,
Respondents.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 4:13-cv-988-RBP-TMP

ORDER
On November 12, 2013, the magistrate judge filed his report and recommendation in the
above-styled cause, recommending that this petition for habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2241 be denied and dismissed as moot. To date, no objections have been filed by either
party.
Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file,
including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and
hereby is ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Consequently, the petition for writ
of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the above-styled cause is due to be and the
same is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
DONE and ORDERED this the 5th day of December, 2013.

ROBERT B. PROPST
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE