Simpson v. Alabama Department of Human Resources, State of et al
ORDER ADOPTING the 20 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation IN PART,FINDING AS MOOT 7 Motion to Dismiss in light of the 21 Amended Complaint and 23 Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, DENYING 18 MOTION to recuse Judge Cornelius. This matter is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further action regarding the pending 23 Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 3/2/2016. (JLC)
2016 Mar-02 AM 11:41
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SAMMY EDWARDS SIMPSON, II, )
) Case No.: 4:13-CV-1450-SGC
STATE OF ALABAMA
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN
RESOURCES, et al.,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IN PART
On January 15, 2016, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation was
entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file
objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. No objections
have been filed by either the plaintiff or the defendants. However, the plaintiff has
filed an Amended Complaint since the magistrate judge submitted her report and
recommendation; the defendants have moved to dismiss it.
After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate
judge's report and recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS IN PART the
report of the magistrate judge. The court further ACCEPTS IN PART the
recommendations of the magistrate judge, and it is, therefore,
DONE and ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that:
Simpson’s motion to recuse Judge Cornelius (doc. 18) is DENIED.
The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7) is termed as MOOT in light of the
Amended Complaint (doc. 21) and Motion to Dismiss the Amended
Complaint (doc. 23).
This matter is REFERRED back to the magistrate judge for further
action regarding the pending Motion to Dismiss the Amended
DONE this the 2nd day of March, 2016.
VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?