Hoskin v. Fife et al

Filing 17

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION Signed by Judge William M Acker, Jr on 3/14/16. (SAC )* MO placed in first class mail to pro se Plaintiff.

Download PDF
FILED 2016 Mar-14 PM 04:15 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION TORRECO HOSKIN, Plaintiff vs. C.O. BRIAN FIFE, et al., Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:14-CV-00328-WMA-HGD MEMORANDUM OF OPINION The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on February 5, 2015, recommending that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (doc. 17) be granted and that the plaintiff’s claims against all defendants be dismissed with prejudice. The parties were allowed fourteen (14) days to file objections and advised that the failure to file such objections would bar any later challenge or review of the factual findings of the magistrate judge. No objections have been received by the court. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge’s report is due to be and is hereby is ADOPTED and the Page 1 of 2 recommendation is ACCEPTED. The court EXPRESSLY finds that there are no genuine issues of material fact and the defendants are entitled to judgment in their favor as a matter of law. Accordingly, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is due to be GRANTED and the plaintiff’s claims are due to be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A Final Judgment will be entered. DONE this 14th day of March, 2016. _____________________________ WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?