Hoskin v. Fife et al

Filing 17

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION Signed by Judge William M Acker, Jr on 3/14/16. (SAC )* MO placed in first class mail to pro se Plaintiff.

FILED
2016 Mar-14 PM 04:15
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
MIDDLE DIVISION
TORRECO HOSKIN,
Plaintiff
vs.
C.O. BRIAN FIFE, et al.,
Defendants

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 4:14-CV-00328-WMA-HGD

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on February 5, 2015,
recommending that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (doc. 17) be
granted and that the plaintiff’s claims against all defendants be dismissed with
prejudice. The parties were allowed fourteen (14) days to file objections and advised
that the failure to file such objections would bar any later challenge or review of the
factual findings of the magistrate judge. No objections have been received by the
court.
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court
file, including the report and recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the
magistrate judge’s report is due to be and is hereby is ADOPTED and the
Page 1 of 2

recommendation is ACCEPTED. The court EXPRESSLY finds that there are no
genuine issues of material fact and the defendants are entitled to judgment in their
favor as a matter of law.
Accordingly, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is due to be
GRANTED and the plaintiff’s claims are due to be DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE. A Final Judgment will be entered.
DONE this 14th day of March, 2016.

_____________________________
WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Page 2 of 2