Nwabuisi v. Holder et al

Filing 2

MEMORANDUM filed. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 6/26/2014. (c/m 6/26/2014)(ko, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 6/27/2014.]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
RICHARD N. NWABUISI, #A1650517
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, et al.

*
* CIVIL ACTION NO. CCB-14-2025
*

*
***
MEMORANDUM
On January 8, 2014, Richard Nwabuisi, then detained at the Worcester County Jail in
Snow Hill, Maryland awaiting deportation to his native country of Nigeria, filed a 28 U.S.C. §
2241 petition claiming that he had been held in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”)
custody beyond the expiration of the presumptive six-month removal period in violation of
Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 701 (2001).1 The petition was denied in a March 13, 2014,
Memorandum based on Nwabuisi’s refusal to board commercial flights to Nigeria which resulted
in expiration of the necessary travel documents. Although the petition was dismissed, the court
stated that “[s]hould his detention continue beyond May of 2014, he may again seek habeas
corpus relief in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.” (Nwabuisi v. Holder, Civil Action No.
CCB-14-49, ECF No. 13, at 5.)
Nwabuisi remains in detention and is currently in the custody of the Warden at the
Etowah County Jail in Gadsden, Alabama. He filed the above-captioned petition pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2241, again citing Zadvydas. He argues that venue lies in this court based on the March
13, 2014, Memorandum issued in Nwabuisi v. Holder, Civil Action No. CCB-14-49 (D. Md.).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(a), “writs of habeas corpus may be granted by . . . the
district courts . . . within their respective jurisdictions.” A petition for writ of habeas corpus
1

The validity of the removal order mandating Nwabuisi’s deportation was not at issue.

“does not act upon the prisoner who seeks relief, but upon the person who holds him in what is
alleged to be unlawful custody.” Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky, 410 U.S.
484, 494-95 (1973).2 Jurisdiction over an action under § 2241 lies in the federal district court
where the petitioner is incarcerated or in the federal district court where the petitioner’s
custodian is located. See id.; Guerra v. Meese, 786 F.2d 414, 416 (D.C. Cir. 1986); Boone v.
United States Parole Comm’n, 648 F. Supp. 479, 480 (D. Md. 1986). Nwabuisi is currently
confined at the Etowah County Jail in Gadsden, Alabama, and was at that facility at the time he
filed the instant action.
Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The
Clerk shall transfer the petition to the appropriate jurisdiction, the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama.

Date: June 26, 2014

___________/s/______________
Catherine C. Blake
United States District Judge

2 An application for a writ of habeas corpus “shall allege . . . the name of the person who has custody over him and
by virtue of what claim or authority, if known.” 28 U.S.C. § 2242. Here, the proper respondent would be the
warden of the jail in which Nwabuisi is being held.

2