Nye v. Riley et al

Filing 3

ORDER The court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is due to be ADOPTED, and his recommendations ACCEPTED. The claims against Judge Tim Riley and Suzie McCoy, and the claims against Markita Shaw and Romona Rodgers in their off icial capacities, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This action is REFERRED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings as to Nye's First Amendment claims against Shaw and Rogers regarding the opening and copying of Nye's legal mail, and Nye's Eighth Amendment claim against Shaw for her refusal to have Nye's prescriptions filled. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 4/20/17. (SAC ) *Order placed in first class mail to pro se Plaintiff.

Download PDF
FILED 2017 Apr-20 AM 11:10 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION JAMES DONALD NYE, Plaintiff, v. TIM RILEY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action Number 4:16-cv-00806-AKK-HGD ORDER James Donald Nye filed this lawsuit alleging violations of his constitutional rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 1. The magistrate judge filed a report on March 29, 2017, recommending that Nye’s complaint be dismissed in part, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). Doc. 2 at 24. The court advised the parties of their right to file specific written objections within fourteen days. Id. at 25. Nye did not submit any objections within the prescribed time period. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the Report and Recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge’s report is due to be ADOPTED, and his recommendations ACCEPTED. Accordingly, the claims against Judge Tim Riley and Suzie McCoy, and the claims against Markita Shaw and Romona Rodgers in their official capacities, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This action is REFERRED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings as to Nye’s First Amendment claims against Shaw and Rogers regarding the opening and copying of Nye’s legal mail, and Nye’s Eighth Amendment claim against Shaw for her refusal to have Nye’s prescriptions filled. DONE the 20th day of April, 2017. _________________________________ ABDUL K. KALLON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?