Moore v. Entrekin et al

Filing 57

MEMORANDUM OPINION ADOPTING and ACCEPTING the 56 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 5/20/2019. (JLC)

Download PDF
FILED 2019 May-20 PM 04:56 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION CORION LESHON MOORE, Plaintiff, v. TODD ENTREKIN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:18-cv-00224-KOB-JEO ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION The magistrate judge filed a report on April 15, 2019, recommending that the plaintiff’s claims under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (“RLUIPA”) be dismissed as moot and further recommending that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted on the plaintiff’s remaining claims. (Doc. 56). Although the parties were advised of their right to file specific, written objections within fourteen days, the court has not received any objections. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court ADOPTS the magistrate judge’s report and ACCEPTS the recommendation. The court EXPRESSLY FINDS that the plaintiff’s claims under RLUIPA are moot; that no genuine issues of material fact remain; and that the defendants are entitled to judgment in their favor as a matter of law. Accordingly, the court finds that the defendants’ motions for summary judgment (docs. 31 and 49) should be granted and those claims dismissed with prejudice. The court will enter a Final Judgment. ____________________________________ KARON OWEN BOWDRE CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?