Jones v. Jones et al
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM OPINION - Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge's Report is hereby ADOPTED and the Recommendation is ACCEPTED. Therefore, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), this action is due to be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. A Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 1/7/2021. (KEK)
FILED
2021 Jan-07 AM 09:25
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
MIDDLE DIVISION
JUSTIN DEVONTERRIOUS JONES,
Plaintiff,
v.
WARDEN III KARLA JONES,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:19-cv-00632-RDP-JHE
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on November 9, 2020,
recommending this action be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which
relief can be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). (Doc. 11). Although the Magistrate
Judge advised Plaintiff of his right to file specific written objections,1 the court has received no
objections.
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file,
including the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge’s Report is hereby ADOPTED
and the Recommendation is ACCEPTED. Therefore, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b),
this action is due to be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief
can be granted. A Final Judgment will be entered.
DONE and ORDERED this January 7, 2021.
_________________________________
R. DAVID PROCTOR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
When the Report and Recommendation was returned to the court as “undeliverable” (Doc. 12), a copy of
the Report and Recommendation was resent to Plaintiff at Fountain Correctional Center and he was provided
additional time to file objections. (Doc. 13).
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?