Moore v. Walton et al
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM OPINION - Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the Report and Recommendation and Plaintiff's Objections, the Magistrate Judge's Report is hereby ADOPTED and the Recommendation is ACCEPTED. Therefore, this action is due to be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. A separate order will be entered. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 1/7/2021. (KEK)
FILED
2021 Jan-07 AM 09:23
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
MIDDLE DIVISION
CHARLES EUGENE MOORE,
Plaintiff,
v.
MS. WALTON, et al.,
Defendants.
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
Case No.: 4:20-cv-1370-RDP-GMP
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On November 30, 2020, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation was entered
and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the
recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. # 6). On December 15, 2020, Plaintiff filed
objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. (Doc. # 7).
Plaintiff’s main objection is that he requests additional time to pay the partial filing fee.
The simple answer to that objection is that Plaintiff may refile this § 1983 action when he is able
to pay a partial filing fee. The dismissal of this action without prejudice will not prevent that action.
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file,
including the Report and Recommendation and Plaintiff’s Objections, the Magistrate Judge’s
Report is hereby ADOPTED and the Recommendation is ACCEPTED. Therefore, this action is
due to be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. A separate order will be entered.
DONE and ORDERED this January 7, 2021.
_________________________________
R. DAVID PROCTOR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?