Walker v. Thompkins et al
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 3/28/2024. (KAM)
FILED
2024 Mar-28 PM 05:05
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
MIDDLE DIVISION
CHARLES E. WALKER,
Plaintiff,
v.
STEVE THOMPKINS, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:21-cv-00684-MHH-JHE
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In this action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, pro se plaintiff Charles E. Walker
asserts claims against the defendants for alleged violations of his rights under the
Constitution or laws of the United States. (Doc. 1, 17). On February 2, 2024, the
magistrate judge entered a report in which he recommends that the Court grant the
defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismiss Mr. Walker’s claims with
prejudice. (Doc. 49). The magistrate judge advised the parties of their right to file
specific written objections to the report within 14 days. (Doc. 49). To date, the
Court has not received objections.
After reviewing the record in this case and the magistrate judge’s report, the
Court adopts the report and accepts the magistrate judge’s recommendation.
Consistent with that recommendation, the Court grants the defendants’ motion for
summary judgment. The Court will enter a final judgment.
DONE and ORDERED this March 28, 2024.
_________________________________
MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?