Chasteen v. Mitchem et al
Filing
11
ORDER: 10 , Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Consequently, the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the above-styled cause is due to be and the same is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 08/30/12. (CVA)
FILED
2012 Aug-30 AM 11:50
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
LELDON PIERCE CHASTEEN,
Petitioner,
vs.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE STATE OF ALABAMA,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 5:11-cv-4210-AKK-TMP
ORDER
On July 11, 2012 , the magistrate judge filed his report and recommendation
in the above-styled cause, recommending that this petition for habeas corpus relief
filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be denied and dismissed. To date, no
objections have been filed by either party.
Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in
the court file, including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion
that the report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED, and the recommendation is
ACCEPTED. Consequently, the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the above-styled cause is due to be and the same is hereby
DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Done the 30th day of August, 2012.
________________________________
ABDUL K. KALLON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?