Lockhart et al v. Vest et al
Filing
85
ORDER in accordance with the memo opn entered contemporaneously,adopting in part 81 Report and Recommendations; there being no genuine issue of material fact, granting 48 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 50 Motion for Summary Jud gment; granting 52 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 54 Motion for Summary Judgment; all of the pla's claims except for pla Glenda Lockehart's claims for false arrest and false imprisonment against dft Tony Vest are DISMISSED w/prejudice; as pla's claims against dft Vest remain pending, this action is reassigned to Magistrate Judge T. Michael Putnam for further proceedings. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 7/10/2014. (KAM, )
FILED
2014 Jul-10 PM 04:43
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
HAROLD LOCKHART, et al.,
Plaintiff;
vs.
TONY VEST, et al.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
5:12-cv-01023-LSC
ORDER
In accordance with the Memorandum of Opinion entered contemporaneously
herewith, the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 81) is hereby
ADOPTED and ACCEPTED in part and NOT ADOPTED and NOT ACCEPTED
in part. There being no genuine issue of material fact, the defendants’ motions for full
and partial summary judgment (docs. 48, 50, 52 and 54) are hereby GRANTED. All
of the plaintiffs’ claims, except for plaintiff, Glenda Lockhart’s, claims for false arrest
and false imprisonment against defendant, Tony Vest, are hereby DISMISSED with
PREJUDICE.
As plaintiff, Glenda Lockhart’s, claims for false arrest and false imprisonment
against defendant, Tony Vest, remain pending, it is hereby ORDERED that this action
be REASSIGNED to the Honorable T. Michael Putnam, for further proceedings not
inconsistent with this opinion.
Done this 10th day of July 2014.
L. Scott Coogler
United States District Judge
[160704]
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?