Washington v. Armstrong et al
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION. Signed by Judge Robert B Propst on 7/23/2014. (AVC)
FILED
2014 Jul-23 AM 08:43
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
RONALD JERMAINE WASHINGTON,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
vs.
OFFICER A. ARMSTRONG,
Defendant.
Case No. 5:12-cv-04048-RBP-JHE
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
The magistrate judge filed a report on June 26, 2014, recommending that Defendant’s motion
for summary judgment be granted and this action dismissed with prejudice. Although the parties
were advised that they may file specific written objections within fourteen days, no party has
responded to the report and recommendation.
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including
the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is due
to be and hereby is ADOPTED and his recommendation is ACCEPTED. The Court EXPRESSLY
FINDS that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that Defendant is entitled to judgment
as a matter of law. Accordingly, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is due to be GRANTED
and this action is due to be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A Final Judgment will be entered.
DONE this the 23rd day of July, 2014.
___________________________________
ROBERT B. PROPST
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?