Blanchard et al v. United States of America et al
Filing
38
ORDER ADOPTING 36 CORRECTED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; GRANTING 9 MOTION to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment filed by USA; DENYING plffs' 22 , 27 , 33 , and 34 MOTIONS for Joinder, and 31 MOTION to Begin Discovery. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 4/13/15. (YMB)
FILED
2015 Apr-13 PM 12:26
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
DEIDRA MONET
BLANCHARD et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA et al.,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.
5:13-cv-00729-JEO
Defendants.
ORDER
On March 6, 2015, the magistrate judge entered a corrected report and
recommendation, doc. 36, regarding the defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the
alternative, motion for summary judgment, doc. 9, the plaintiffs’ motions for
joinder of additional parties, docs. 22, 27, 33, and 34, and the plaintiffs’ motion to
begin discovery, doc. 31, and the parties were allowed fourteen (14) days in which
to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. Neither
party objected.
Having reviewed the complaint, the motions, the briefs, and the magistrate’s
Page 1 of 2
report and recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the report of the
magistrate judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendation of the
magistrate judge that the defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative,
motion for summary judgment, doc. 9, be GRANTED and the plaintiffs’ motion
for joinder of additional parties, docs. 22, 27, 33, and 34, and for leave to begin
discovery, doc. 31, be DENIED. This matter is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
DONE this 13th day of April, 2015.
________________________________
ABDUL K. KALLON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?