Blanchard et al v. United States of America et al

Filing 38

ORDER ADOPTING 36 CORRECTED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; GRANTING 9 MOTION to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment filed by USA; DENYING plffs' 22 , 27 , 33 , and 34 MOTIONS for Joinder, and 31 MOTION to Begin Discovery. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 4/13/15. (YMB)

Download PDF
FILED 2015 Apr-13 PM 12:26 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION DEIDRA MONET BLANCHARD et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:13-cv-00729-JEO Defendants. ORDER On March 6, 2015, the magistrate judge entered a corrected report and recommendation, doc. 36, regarding the defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, motion for summary judgment, doc. 9, the plaintiffs’ motions for joinder of additional parties, docs. 22, 27, 33, and 34, and the plaintiffs’ motion to begin discovery, doc. 31, and the parties were allowed fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. Neither party objected. Having reviewed the complaint, the motions, the briefs, and the magistrate’s Page 1 of 2 report and recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendation of the magistrate judge that the defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, motion for summary judgment, doc. 9, be GRANTED and the plaintiffs’ motion for joinder of additional parties, docs. 22, 27, 33, and 34, and for leave to begin discovery, doc. 31, be DENIED. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. DONE this 13th day of April, 2015. ________________________________ ABDUL K. KALLON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?