Anderson v. Alabama, State of

Filing 11

MEMORANDUM OPINION, as set out, re Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 10 . The Court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's findings are due to be and are hereby ADOPTED and his recommendation is ACCEPTED. As a result, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is due to be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn on 7/14/14. (CTS, )

FILED
2014 Jul-14 AM 10:36
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
LAMAR WALLACE ANDERSON,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Petitioner,
v.

THE STATE OF ALABAMA,
Respondent.

CIVIL ACTION NO.
5:13-cv-2008-SLB-JEO

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is a case on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254
by Lamar Wallace Anderson, an Alabama state prisoner acting pro se. The magistrate judge filed
findings and a recommendation that the petition is due to be dismissed without prejudice to allow
Anderson to exhaust his available state remedies. (Doc. 10). No objections have been filed.
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file,
including the findings and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the magistrate
judge’s findings are due to be and are hereby ADOPTED and his recommendation is
ACCEPTED. As a result, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is due to be DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A Final Judgment will be entered.
DONE this the 14th day of July, 2014.

SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE