Hagood v. Morgan County Alabama

Filing 10

MEMORANDUM OPINION re Magistrate Judge Report and Recommendation 8 . Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation and the objections thereto, the Court is of the opinion that the magistrate judges report is due to be and is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. A Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn on 12/23/14. (CTS, )

FILED
2014 Dec-23 PM 02:50
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
RODNEY HAGOOD,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
MORGAN COUNTY ALABAMA,
Defendant.

Case no. 5:14-cv-773-SLB-JEO

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on November 10,
2014, recommending that this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 be dismissed
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted, or seeking monetary relief from defendants who are immune. (Doc. 8). The
magistrate judge further recommended this court decline to exercise supplemental
jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s state law claims. (Id.) The plaintiff filed objections
to the report and recommendation on November 18, 2014. (Doc. 9).
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court
file, including the report and recommendation and the objections thereto, the Court
is of the opinion that the magistrate judge’s report is due to be and is hereby
ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, the complaint is
1

due to be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failing to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted, or seeking monetary relief from defendants who are
immune. Supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s state law claims is due to be
declined. A Final Judgment will be entered.
DATED this 23rd day of December, 2014.

SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2